Police reform tool rarely used by local prosecutors

Prosecutors in Atlanta, Chicago, Tulsa and Pittsburgh told the AP they did not track officers with disciplinary issues, and prosecutors in Milwaukee only listed officers who were convicted of crimes.

The Dallas County District Attorney’s list contained 192 names, with offenses ranging from misrepresentation to convictions for theft, assault and impaired driving. The Suffolk County, Massachusetts attorney’s list included officers from Boston who had lied on their timesheets or embezzled funds. The Orleans, Louisiana parish attorney followed officers who committed crimes, lied or drove dangerously, but not violent arrests.

Dishonesty puts an officer on the roster in Detroit, Denver, and Seattle, but the use of excessive force does not.

The Phoenix District Attorney, along with Orange County, Florida and Los Angeles prosecutors, were among the few people the PA found to include cases of excessive use of force on their lists.

“It’s like there’s a huge continuum and the result is you don’t have the same procedures followed not just across the country but in individual states,” said Will Aitchison, a lawyer from Portland, in Oregon, Labor Relations Information Systems, which represents officers after appealing disciplinary orders.

Previous The global SMS market size is expected to grow from $ 22.8 billion in 2021 to $ 43.7 billion by 2026, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.9%.
Next Daily Research News Online no. 32291